Amaury Raynel vs Filip Jeff Planinsek Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Raynel's second serve win rate stands at 37.17%, compared to Planinsek's 41.46% over the last six months. Does Planinsek's superior second serve performance indicate an advantage? It suggests so.
• Looking at return game stats, Raynel has captured 47.26% of opponent's second serve points, slightly lower than Planinsek’s 47.73%. However, on first serve returns, Raynel surpasses Planinsek with 30.41% versus 24.79%. Could this give Raynel an edge in first serve returns? It seems likely.
• Under pressure, Raynel saved 48.84% of breakpoints, while Planinsek saved 54.35%. Does Planinsek possess better breakpoint resilience? The data indicates they do.
• In terms of overall match wins over the past year, Raynel holds a 54.72% win rate, whereas Planinsek slightly edges out with 57.89%. Who shows stronger recent performance? Planinsek.
• Both players perform well on Hard surfaces, with Raynel winning 62% and Planinsek 57%. Whose record indicates a slight advantage? Raynel, due to a higher win percentage.
• Considering player level, Planinsek has a higher match win percentage in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments at 67.74% compared to Raynel’s 55.77%. Does this reflect better form? It likely does.
• Regarding opponent quality, Raynel has faced slightly higher-ranked competition, with the average opponent rank at 420.47, compared to Planinsek's 468.21. Could this mean Raynel is more seasoned against stronger competition? Possibly.
• If the match progresses to a deciding set, Planinsek holds the advantage, winning 57% of such sets compared to Raynel’s 45%. Will Planinsek's deciding set prowess play a key role? It appears that way.
• Analyzing break point conversion, Planinsek is more effective, converting 39.13% of opportunities, against Raynel’s 35.25%. Does this imply Planinsek is more adept at capitalizing on break chances? The stats support this view.

Editorial Prediction (June 19, 2025, UTC):

As the upcoming match between Raynel and Planinsek approaches, the comparative analysis of their recent performances highlights distinct areas of relative strengths and weaknesses.

Raynel demonstrates a solid first serve return performance and a commendable track record on Hard surfaces. Despite facing higher-ranked opponents, Raynel maintains a competitive edge in match wins.

Conversely, Planinsek shows superior second serve success, breakpoint resilience, and decisive match handling, with a noteworthy performance against similarly ranked players.

The slight edge in various statistical areas coupled with competitive tenacity signals Planinsek as the likely victor in the impending clash.